· 8 min

CTV advertising in India: stop treating the biggest screen as a branding luxury

TL;DR. Most Indian marketers file CTV under "brand awareness" and never measure it. That is the mistake. Connected TV is the only large-screen channel where you can target a household, cap frequency, and read completed views and incremental lift against a control group. It is not a branding luxury - it is the most measurable big-screen buy in the country. The audience already moved to the internet-connected television; the brands winning it are the ones running it lower-funnel, with a geo holdout wired before the first rupee is spent.

40mn+connected-TV households in India, 2025 (EY-FICCI M&E Report, 2025)
100mn+smart-TV screens in the installed base (EY-FICCI, 2025)
~91%video completion rate on CTV non-skippable inventory, India (VDO.AI Ad Engagement Benchmark Study, 2025)
₹300-500our data: typical premium CTV CPM range we see on major Indian OTT platforms; live sports goes higher

01Why CTV is mispriced as a branding luxury

Ask most Indian brand teams where CTV sits and they will say "top of funnel, awareness, alongside the TVC budget". That single filing decision is why so much CTV money underperforms. It gets bought like linear - a reach number, a nice film, a wave around a launch - and then never measured, because nobody expected it to answer to a number. The result is a self-fulfilling prophecy: unmeasured spend looks like a branding spend.

Here is the contrarian read. CTV is the only large-screen channel that can be run as performance media, because it is the only one that lets you pick a household, cap how often that household sees you, and count exactly who completed the view. Linear cannot do any of the three. Treating CTV as awareness throws away the one thing that makes it different from the television it replaces.

At Buzzard Pro we route CTV through the same discipline as any lower-funnel channel: a target audience, a frequency cap, a completion benchmark, and an incrementality test. If a channel can carry a holdout, it can carry a number - so we make it.

02The linear comparison that decides the buy

The case for CTV is not "streaming is trendy". It is a line-by-line comparison against the linear prime-time slot it competes with for the same rupee. Put the two side by side and the awareness framing collapses - CTV wins on every axis that touches efficiency, and only loses on raw simultaneous mass reach.

Linear prime-time versus CTV for the same living-room screen. The only column linear wins is raw simultaneous reach.
What you are buyingLinear TV (GEC prime-time)CTV (JioHotstar, Prime Video, Netflix)
Unit of saleA slot, priced on projected TRPA household impression, priced on CPM
TargetingChannel and daypart, roughlyGeo, demographic, content genre, first-party segments
Frequency controlNone - you cannot cap per homeCapped per household, per campaign
MeasurementSampled panel estimateImpression-level logs and completed views
Proof of liftNot possibleGeo holdout, incrementality readable
Where linear still winsRaw simultaneous mass reachReach builds over sessions, not one airing
The waste linear cannot fix

On linear you have no way to stop the same household seeing your spot twelve times in one evening while a neighbouring home sees it zero times. That uncapped, unmeasurable frequency is the structural leak. CTV's frequency cap is not a nice-to-have - it is the single mechanic that recovers the budget linear quietly burns.

03The tipping point: the audience moved, budgets did not

The reason this argument matters now, and not in 2022, is scale. India crossed the line where CTV stops being a pilot. Connected-TV households passed 40 million in 2025 and the smart-TV installed base sits above 100 million screens (EY-FICCI M&E Report, 2025). After the Disney-Reliance merger, JioHotstar became the anchor platform and reported record big-screen concurrency during IPL 2025. Amazon Prime Video rolled out ad-supported viewing to Indian subscribers in 2025, and Netflix's ad tier keeps widening its Indian inventory.

The signal underneath the platform news is the one that should move budgets: viewing minutes are migrating off the phone and onto the television, while urban linear viewership flattens. The audience has already made the switch. Ad money has not - which is exactly the arbitrage window.

~10mn ~19mn ~30mn 40mn+ 2022 2023 2024 2025 Connected-TV households, India
Connected-TV homes in India passed 40 million in 2025. Year-by-year connected-TV household figures drawn from EY-FICCI India Media and Entertainment Reports, 2024 and 2025.

Who is actually behind those 40 million screens?

Affluent, urban and semi-urban households - the exact audience D2C brands, BFSI, auto and premium FMCG chase. It is a lean-back, full-attention environment with near-100% viewability, and completion on non-skippable inventory routinely clears 90%, against the scroll-past reality of a mobile feed. You are not just reaching a valuable person; you are reaching them while they are actually watching.

04The test that turns CTV into performance media

Everything above is theory until you can prove lift. The mechanic that converts CTV from an awareness line into a measured channel is the geo holdout: run CTV in some cities and deliberately withhold it in comparable ones, then read the difference in site visits, app installs or sales between the two. That is incrementality, and it is the number a CFO actually respects. No linear buy in India can hand you it.

Do not confuse the platform's own dashboard with proof. Each walled garden - JioHotstar, Prime Video, Netflix - grades its own homework on its own attribution window. Pull the raw exposure and outcome data into one sheet, normalise the window, and judge the channel against a control group, not against the seller's report. This belongs next to your wider performance marketing measurement, read together with lower-funnel channels rather than siloed as a brand spend.

If a channel can carry a holdout, it can carry a number. CTV can carry a holdout - so stop budgeting it as if it cannot.

Take this to your next media planning session

Five checks before you sign a CTV buy in India

  1. Is this filed as performance, not awareness? Give it an outcome metric before you give it a budget, or it will drift into unmeasured brand spend.
  2. Have you picked two platforms, not five? Usually JioHotstar plus one of Prime Video or Netflix - concentrated reach beats a thin spread.
  3. Is the creative CTV-native? A 15 to 20 second film built for a big, silent-capable screen, not a repurposed vertical Reel.
  4. Are frequency caps set from day one? This is the mechanic that recovers the budget linear burns - do not launch without it.
  5. Is a geo holdout wired before you spend? Withhold CTV in comparable cities so you can read incrementality, not just the platform's self-reported reach.

FAQ

01

What is CTV advertising in simple terms?

CTV advertising means running video ads on internet-connected televisions - a smart TV, or a regular set fed by a Fire TV Stick, Chromecast or console running a streaming app. You get the impact of the big living-room screen, but the ad is bought and measured like digital: targeted by audience, frequency-capped, and tracked impression by impression rather than by a sampled TRP estimate.

02

Is CTV advertising a branding spend or a performance channel?

That framing is the mistake. CTV is the only large-screen channel where you can run a geo holdout, cap frequency per household and read completed views and downstream lift against a control group. Treated as a measurable, lower-funnel line with an incrementality test, it behaves like performance media. The brands losing on CTV are the ones who file it under awareness and never measure it.

03

How much does CTV advertising cost in India?

CTV is bought on a CPM basis. In our buys across major Indian OTT platforms, premium non-live inventory typically runs in the ₹300-500 CPM range, with live sports and marquee content pushing higher. It is not the cheapest impression available, but per qualified household on a near-100 percent-viewable screen it is far more efficient than the effective cost of comparable linear prime-time, where you buy a projected TRP and no household-level proof.

04

Is CTV better than linear TV for a growing brand?

For most growing brands, yes. Linear sells projected TRP slots with no frequency control and no household-level measurement. CTV sells targeted households, caps how often each one sees the spot, and reports impression-level completed views. You cut waste and can prove lift. Linear still wins on raw simultaneous mass reach for a very large national push, but on precision, accountability and starting budget, CTV wins.

05

What kind of brand should start with CTV, and how?

D2C brands that have plateaued on Meta and Google, and regional brands wanting a specific geography without national waste, are the best fits, along with launches that want television credibility without a Bollywood-sized production budget. Start with two platforms, CTV-native 15 to 20 second creative built for a silent-capable big screen, frequency caps from day one, and a geo holdout wired before you spend so you can read incrementality, not just reach.

← All articles
Get in touch

Let's make some buzz.

Got a brief, a budget, or a wild idea you can't shake? Drop us a line. We reply within one working day.

Got a cookie? Let's get a coffee!
email team@buzzard.pro click to mail
phone +91 8884 428 877 click to call
WhatsApp +91 8884 428 877 click to WhatsApp
office Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110017 click to navigate